Introduction

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States are two influential privacy regimes shaping how data centers handle personal information. While both aim to protect consumer rights, their specific requirements can differ significantly—from breach notification timelines to the scope of data subject requests. This article compares GDPR and CCPA obligations for data centers, offering guidance on how operators can maintain compliance in transatlantic operations.

1. Overview: GDPR and CCPA

GDPR (EU): Enacted in 2018, GDPR has strict rules on data collection, processing, and transfer, with potential fines up to 4% of global annual revenue for non-compliance. It applies to any entity handling EU residents’ data, regardless of location.
CCPA (California): Effective since 2020, CCPA grants California residents increased control over personal data, including the right to know, delete, and opt out of the sale of personal information. Enforcement is carried out by the California Attorney General, with private rights of action for data breaches in certain circumstances.

2. Scope of Personal Data

GDPR: Defines personal data broadly, encompassing anything that can directly or indirectly identify an individual (name, email, IP address, etc.). Special categories (like health data) receive added protection.
CCPA: Covers “personal information,” also broad, but with certain exceptions for publicly available data. Unlike GDPR, CCPA specifically focuses on data “sold” to third parties, though the term “sell” is defined expansively, covering many types of data sharing.

3. Data Subject Rights

GDPR: Grants data subjects the rights to access, rectify, erase (the “right to be forgotten”), restrict processing, and port data. Consent is a major lawful basis for processing, though others like legitimate interest also apply.
CCPA: Gives California residents the right to know what personal information is collected and how it’s used, delete their data (with some exemptions), and opt out of data sales. Businesses must include a “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” link on their website if they “sell” data under CCPA’s broad definitions.

4. Impact on Data Centers

Controller vs. Processor (GDPR): Under GDPR, data centers typically act as “processors” on behalf of “controllers.” Processors must follow data processing agreements (DPAs) that outline instructions, security measures, and breach notification procedures.
Service Provider (CCPA): CCPA carves out a “service provider” role for entities processing data on behalf of a “business.” Data centers that meet service provider criteria avoid classification as a “third party,” reducing their compliance burden. However, they must not use personal data for purposes beyond the scope of the contract.

5. Security and Breach Notification

GDPR: Requires breach notification to the relevant supervisory authority within 72 hours of discovery if the breach is likely to pose a risk to individuals’ rights and freedoms. Operators also must notify affected individuals without undue delay when risk is high.
CCPA: Has no explicit universal breach notification timeline; instead, California’s general data breach law requires “reasonable” disclosure. Individuals can sue if a breach is due to a business’s lack of “reasonable security,” leading to potential statutory damages.

6. Fines and Penalties

GDPR: Severe monetary penalties can reach up to €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover, whichever is higher. Supervisory authorities also have investigative and corrective powers (e.g., ordering data deletion).
CCPA: Statutory damages up to $750 per consumer per incident can add up quickly in class actions for data breaches. The California Attorney General can seek up to $2,500 per unintentional violation or $7,500 per intentional violation, with a 30-day cure period in some instances.

7. Contracts and Data Processing Agreements

DPA Essentials (GDPR): Data center contracts must define processing scope, data security measures, sub-processor usage, and breach notification. Many data centers provide standard DPA addendums that mirror GDPR requirements.
Service Provider Terms (CCPA): Similar to GDPR DPAs, operators should craft CCPA-compliant contracts stating they do not “sell” personal data, ensure data usage is limited to the agreed-upon business purpose, and prohibit unauthorized retention or disclosure. Failure to meet these criteria could transform a service provider into a “business” or “third party,” increasing liability.

8. Ensuring Dual Compliance

Data centers hosting multinational clients often face overlapping GDPR and CCPA duties. A practical approach includes:
Unified Framework: Build a compliance program that meets the stricter GDPR standards, then layer on CCPA’s unique provisions. This synergy can minimize duplication.
Privacy by Design: Integrate privacy controls at the architecture level—like data minimization and robust access logs. This helps demonstrate good-faith compliance if authorities investigate.
Transparent Policies: Clearly outline in contracts and privacy notices how personal data flows and who is responsible for fulfilling data subject rights across different jurisdictions.

Conclusion

While GDPR and CCPA share a common goal of safeguarding personal information, each imposes distinct obligations that can dramatically affect data center operations. From verifying if an operator qualifies as a “processor” or “service provider” to implementing breach notification protocols, compliance requires diligence and thorough contractual safeguards. By crafting flexible privacy policies, strong DPAs, and well-documented security measures, data centers can navigate both European and Californian regulations effectively—protecting themselves, their clients, and the individuals whose data they store.

For more details, please visit www.imperialdatacenter.com/disclaimer.